|
Source |
Category |
Page |
Quotation |
|
Lobb 2007 |
Adjustment |
|
the contact boundary is the place where creativity
(which expresses the uniqueness of the individual) can
be combined with adjustment (which expresses that
reciprocity which is necessary to social living). |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Anxiety |
P231 |
Anxiety is the interruption of the excitement of
creative growth |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Awareness |
P229 |
Aware response in the field is the agency of growth in
the field |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Awareness |
P229 |
What is called ‘consciousness’ seems to be a special
kind of awareness, a contact-function where there are
difficulties and delays of adjustment |
|
Perls et al |
Confluence |
P451 |
Confluence is the condition of no-contact |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Consciousness |
P229 |
What is called ‘consciousness’ seems to be a special
kind of awareness, a contact-function where there are
difficulties and delays of adjustment |
|
Lobb 2000 |
Contact |
|
Contact is the end of self |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P073 |
Your sense of unitary interfunctioning of you and your
environment is contact, and the process of contacting is
the forming and sharpening of the figure/ground
contrast. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P073 |
For you as a living being contact is, then, ultimate
reality |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P118 |
Every healthy contact involves awareness (perceptual
figure/ground) and excitement (increased energy
mobilization) |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P229 |
Experience is ultimately contact, the functioning of the
boundary of the organism and its environment |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P230 |
Primarily, contact is the awareness of, and behaviour
toward, the assimilable novelty; and the rejection of
the inassimilable novelty |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P230 |
All contact is creative and dynamic . . . because it
must cope with the novel . . . cannot passively accept
or merely adjust to the novel, because the novel
must be assimilated |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P230 |
All contact is creative adjustment of the organism and
environment |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Contact |
P373 |
Contacting is, generally, the growing of the organism.
By contacting we mean … in general every function that
must be primarily considered as occurring at the
boundary in an organism/environment field. |
|
Philippson |
Contact |
P008 |
.
. . “if I am in good contact with my environment, I am
more likely to achieve my wants and needs”, as opposed
to “the achievement of these wants and needs takes
precedence over the making of contact” |
|
Lobb 2007 |
Contact Boundary |
|
the contact boundary is the place where creativity
(which expresses the uniqueness of the individual) can
be combined with adjustment (which expresses that
reciprocity which is necessary to social living). |
|
Parlett 2003 |
Creative Adjustment |
P51 |
…
having an adaptive and spontaneous response to living in
this world. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creative Adjustment |
P371 |
…
deploying the activity of the self as a temporal
process, … fore-contact, contacting, final-contact,
and post-contact; … is an account of the nature of
creative-adjustment growth |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creative Adjustment |
P404 |
It
is the work of creative adjustment that heightens
awareness of what one wants |
|
Wheeler 2000 |
Creative Adjustment |
P167 |
In
this whole-field process view the creative adjustment,
the living integrative principle or process in action,
is not just something done by a self that is
pre-existent: it is the self, the self which is
‘given in contact’ |
|
Jennings 1986 |
Creativity |
Pvi |
…
I believe that everybody is potentially creative,
whether worker or client. Some of us have to discover
or rediscover our own creativity; and some of us are
tired and jaded. Others are daunted … |
|
Lobb 2007 |
Creativity |
|
the contact boundary is the place where creativity
(which expresses the uniqueness of the individual) can
be combined with adjustment (which expresses that
reciprocity which is necessary to social living). |
|
Lobb and Amendt-Lyon 2003 |
Creativity |
Pix |
Creativity, traditionally seen as a special gift of
remarkable and exceptional personalities … |
|
Lobb and Amendt-Lyon 2003 |
Creativity |
Pix |
…
is considered in Gestalt therapy to be a spontaneous
adaptation in interpersonal processes, as well as an
important ingredient of healthy social living. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creativity |
P230 |
what is assimilated is always novel[i] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creativity |
P231 |
Creativity and adjustment are polar[ii] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creativity |
P367 |
Creativity is inventing[1]
a new solution; inventing it both as finding it and as
devising it; … |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creativity |
P406 |
For the most part, however, we may consider the self’s
creativity and the organism/environment adjustment as
polar: one cannot exist without the other[iii] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Creativity |
P407 |
Creativity without outgoing adjustment remains
superficial (because) the excitement of the unfinished
situation is not drawn on (and) it is in manipulating
the resistant that the self becomes involved and engaged |
|
Philippson |
Cycle of Contact |
P042 - 045 |
Forecontact, Contacting, Final Contact, Post-contact |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Dreams |
P051 |
If
you will notice your dreams, you will discover that you
can make sense of a great many by treating them as
reversal experiments spontaneously performed!
|
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Dreams |
P051 |
In
dreams, the resister gets a chance to express himself
more openly, but he does it in a language which you, the
awake personality, find largely incomprehensible |
|
Sichera 2003 |
Dreams |
P097 |
…
the most useful work on dreams would probably be their
portrayal, in literary or pictorial form, by the
dreamer. In other words, the “best exercise” in therapy
is probably “letting the dream be” in complete autonomy,
as a work of art, fruit of the extraordinary creative
powers of childhood, which the patient must be able to
experience fully and freely … |
|
Sichera 2003 |
Dreams |
P098 |
The portrayal of the dream, in the presence of and
together with the therapist, puts the dream itself into
the circuit of the relationship. |
|
Sichera 2003 |
Dreams |
P098 |
The dream is …a pure aesthetic form to be listened to
and developed together. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Dreams, daydreams |
P051 |
Daydreams … are spontaneous reversal experiments, and
their meaning is usually more obvious. What we fantasy
ordinarily is the reverse of a present frustration |
|
Philippson |
Ego |
P130 |
Ego is the active process of moving towards some aspects
of the environment (identification) and away from other
(alienation) |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Excitement |
P037 |
The sense of this formative process, the dynamic
relation of ground and figure, is excitement: excitement
is the feeling of the forming of the figure-background
in contact situations, as the unfinished situation tends
to its completion. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Excitement |
P231 |
Anxiety is the interruption of the excitement of
creative growth |
|
McLeod 1993 |
Gestalt |
P26 |
It
the foundation of a psychology without a psyche |
|
Parlett 2003 |
Gestalt |
P51 |
…
a philosophy and method to be lived, not just a theory
to be talked about, and not merely a specialised
approach to psychotherapy. |
|
Lobb 2000 |
Gestalt Theory |
|
What is specific to our theory is that the self is
regarded in the medial position between organism and the
environment, which is to say, in a uniquely relational
position[2] |
|
McLeod |
Growth |
P27 |
In
the “spontaneous absorption of final contact” (Perls et
al 1951 p.418), occurs the assimilation through which
the self functions as the organ of growth (ibid p.229 |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Growth |
P230 |
Growth is the function of the contact boundary in the
organism/environment field |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Growth |
P231 |
Anxiety is the interruption of the excitement of
creative growth |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Growth |
P368 |
…growing, the self risks – risks it with suffering if it
has long avoided risking it and therefore must destroy
many prejudices, introjects, attachments to the fixed
past, securities, plans and ambitions; risks it with
excitement if it can accept living in the present |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Growth |
P372? |
An
organism preserves itself only by growing
Self preserving and growing are polar |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Growth |
P373 |
…
materials and energy of growth are: the conservative
attempt of the organism to remain as it has been, the
novel environment, the destruction of previous partial
equilibria, and the assimilation of something new. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Knowledge |
P367 |
Knowledge is the form of what has already occurred |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Living |
P230 |
…
it is by means of creative adjustment, change and growth
that the complicated organic unities live on in the
large unity of the field. |
|
Philippson |
Middle mode |
P035 |
.
. . what we are looking at is an equal cooperative
effort between me and my environment, where there is no
‘doer’ and no ‘done to’ (or alternatively there is
both). This is the ‘middle mode’: neither active
nor passive. |
|
Philippson |
Middle mode |
P035 |
The other name for this is spontaneity. |
|
Wheeler 2003 |
Perception |
P87 |
Every perception is in a real sense a hypothesis, a
trial organisation of data (literally, “givens”).
We’re “wired” to make this kind of estimation, and to
integrate it into an even wider, ever more complex and
coherent picture of the world: this is our gestalt
nature. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Personality |
P378 |
The personality is the created figure that the self
becomes and assimilates to the organism, uniting it with
the results of previous growth |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Personality |
P382 |
The personality is the system of attitudes assumed in
interpersonal relations. Personality is essentially a
verbal replica of the self. Thus personality is the
responsible structure of the self |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Personality |
P423 |
The aftermath of creative social contact is the
formation of personality |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Personality |
P427 |
In
ideal circumstances the self does not have much
personality. It is the sage of Tao that is “like
water”, assuming the form of the receptacle.
Where the self has much personality, we have seen, it is
because either it carries with it many unfinished
situations … or it has abdicated altogether and feels
itself in the attitudes towards itself that it has
introjeced.[3] |
|
Lobb 2000 |
Self |
|
The self … is conceived in Gestalt Therapy as an
experiential event which takes place in the phenomenal
actuality. |
|
Lobb 2000 |
Self |
|
What is specific to our theory is that the self is
regarded in the medial position between organism and the
environment, which is to say, in a uniquely relational
position |
|
Lobb 2000 |
Self |
P001 |
The theory of self in Gestalt therapy is
epistemologically based on the paradox of theorising the
untheorisable, of grasping experience in its very
transitoriness.[iv]
. And the only route possible was phenomenology |
|
Lobb 2000 |
Self |
P001 – p002 |
The self is a function of the organism-environment
field; it is the “experience of the field” of organism
and environment[v],
it is the system of contacts at the boundary |
|
McLeod 1993 |
Self |
P025 |
The deepest Gestalt premise is that we create ourselves
in our contact . . . our very psychological existence is
dependent on relationship |
|
McLeod 1993 |
Self |
P025 |
We
are the contact we make . . . it follows that self must
be defined as contact |
|
McLeod 1993 |
Self |
P026 |
This concept [of self] is so significantly and so
radically subversive of most psychological thinking that
it has yet to be fully grasped and accepted, even by
many Gestaltists. The concept is, in its simplest form,
that self is contact |
|
McLeod 1993 |
Self |
P026 |
Gestalt asserts, rather, that humans at each moment are
engaged in the creation and destruction of self . . .
indeed, is always in the process of being created and
destroyed |
|
McLeod 1993 |
Self |
P026 |
Self is, rather, part of the world of process and time,
discoverable only as experience; discoverable, that is,
only in contact |
|
Perls 1957 |
Self |
|
The self is that part of the field which is opposed to
otherness |
|
Perls 1957 |
Self |
|
Self cannot be understood other than through the field |
|
Perls 1957 |
Self |
|
The self is to be found in the contrast with the
otherness |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P235 |
Let us call the “self” the system of contacts at any
moment. As such the self is flexibly various, for it
varies with the dominant organic needs and the pressing
environmental stimuli; it is the system of responses; …
|
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P235 |
The self is the contact-boundary at work; its activity
is forming figures and grounds. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P235 |
It
[self] is only a small factor in the total
organism/environment interaction, but it plays the
crucial role of finding and making the meanings by which
we grow. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P247 |
the self is the system of creative adjustment |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P248 |
The self only finds and makes itself in the environment.[4] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P315 |
“personality” is best taken as a formation of the self
by a shared social attitude. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P315 |
…the self, as the system of excitement, orientation,
manipulation, and various identifications and
alienations, is always original and creative. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P367 |
The self is the system of contacts in the
organism/environment field; and these contacts are the
structured experience of the actual present situation. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P371 |
we
consider the self as the function of contacting the
actual transient present[5] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P372 |
An
organism preserves itself only by growing.
Self-preserving and growing are polar, … |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P373 |
The complex system of contacts necessary for adjustment
in the difficult field, we call ‘self’. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P373 |
Self may be regarded as at the boundary of the organism |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P373 |
The self is not to be thought of as a fixed institution;
it exists wherever and whenever there is in fact a
boundary interaction. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P373 |
The complex system of contacts necessary for adjustment
in the difficult field, we call “self”.[6] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P374 |
…
the self is the figure/background process in
contact-situations[7] |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P374 |
In
contact situations the self is the power that forms the
gestalt in the field; or better, the self is the
figure/background process in contact-situations. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P374 |
Self exists where there are the shifting boundaries of
contact. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P378 |
As
aspects of the self in a simple spontaneous act, Id,
Ego, and Personality are the major stages of creative
adjustment: the Id is the given background dissolving
into its possibilities . . . The Ego is the progressive
identification with and alienation of the possibilities,
... of the on-going contact. The Personality is the
created figure that the self becomes and assimilates ... |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P427 |
In
ideal circumstances the self does not have much
personality. It is the sage of Tao that is ‘like
water’, assuming the form of the receptacle[vi]. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Self |
P427 |
In
ideal circumstances the self does not have much
personality. It is the sage of Tao that is “like
water”, assuming the form of the receptacle.
Where the self has much personality, we have seen, it is
because either it carries with it many unfinished
situations … or it has abdicated altogether and feels
itself in the attitudes towards itself that it has
introjeced.[8] |
|
Philippson |
Self |
P001 |
Its [self] primary characteristics are fluidity and
relationship |
|
Philippson |
Self |
P001 |
The concept of self . . . is my varied contacts with the
world I live in, with otherness, rather than
inner experience. |
|
Philippson |
Self |
P031 |
Emergence of three interacting boundaries: the physical
contact boundary, the self/other boundary (I and not-I),
and the personality boundary (e and not-me) |
|
Philippson |
Self |
P032 |
.
. . the differentiation of ‘self’ and ‘other’ is
achieved by the boundary process of identification
and alienation |
|
Philippson |
Self |
P036 |
The self is spontaneous and middle mode, swaying between
the passive, receptive mode of id and the active,
autonomous mode of ego |
|
Wheeler 2000 |
Self |
P175 |
We
understand self to be an active process of meaningful
field integration – making sense of experience as a
ground for action, - with a recursive or continuously
back and forth sequence of
scan-evaluate-interpret-integrate-act[9] |
|
Wheeler 2003 |
Self |
P185 |
Self is comprised of ‘elements of the field |
|
Philippson |
Self-actualisation |
P009 |
The creation of selfhood out of interaction.[vii]
Gestalt therapy explores the actualisation inherent in
the self that is emerging in the present moment. |
|
McLeod |
Spontaneity |
P34 |
Spontaneity is a matter of being fully engaged in the
endless flow and return between id and ego |
|
Philippson |
Spontaneity |
P035 |
equal cooperative effort between me and my environment,
where there is no ‘doer’ and no ‘done to’ (or
alternatively there is both). This is the ‘middle
mode’: neither active nor passive. The other name
for this is spontaneity. |
|
Perls et al 1951 |
Therapy |
P015 |
What is essential is not that the therapist learn
something about the patient and teach it to him, but
that the therapist teach the patient how to learn
about himself |
|
Perls 1957 |
Unfinished Business |
P001 |
If
something happens which, through something non-self,
comes about then we have the unfinished situation |